Free CIPS L4M1 Practice Test & Real Exam Questions

See the solution in Explanation part below
Explanation:
Procurement in third sector (not-for-profit) organisations operates under distinct influences compared to public or private sectors. Understanding these factors is crucial for Parvinder to provide effective consultancy tailored to the sector's unique challenges and requirements. Below are five key factors that influence procurement activities in third sector organisations:
1. Funding Sources and Financial Constraints
Third sector organisations typically rely on donations, grants, fundraising, and government funding rather than sales revenue. This creates tight budgetary controls and unpredictability in funding availability.
Impact on Procurement:
Procurement activities must align closely with available funds, often requiring careful prioritisation, cost-effectiveness, and compliance with funders' conditions. Parvinder should research how the organisation manages fluctuating budgets and whether there are restrictions on how funds can be spent.
2. Regulatory and Compliance Requirements
Not-for-profit organisations are often subject to specific regulatory frameworks and reporting standards, including charity laws, governance codes, and donor-imposed conditions.
Impact on Procurement:
These regulations impact supplier selection, contract management, and transparency obligations. Procurement must ensure compliance with these rules to maintain legitimacy, donor confidence, and avoid legal penalties. Parvinder should assess the regulatory environment affecting procurement processes.
3. Social and Ethical Considerations
Third sector organisations frequently have missions linked to social good, environmental sustainability, and ethical practices. Procurement decisions are influenced by these values and stakeholder expectations.
Impact on Procurement:
Procurement must prioritise suppliers who meet ethical standards, support local communities, and minimize environmental impact. This may limit supplier options but aligns procurement with organisational values and public image. Parvinder should evaluate the organisation's sustainability and CSR policies.
4. Stakeholder Involvement and Governance
Procurement decisions in not-for-profits often involve multiple stakeholders, including trustees, donors, beneficiaries, and volunteers, making the governance structure complex.
Impact on Procurement:
This can lengthen decision-making processes, require additional approvals, and demand higher transparency and accountability. Parvinder should investigate who the key stakeholders are and how procurement decisions are governed and communicated.
5. Market and Supplier Availability
Depending on the organisation's geographic location, niche requirements, and mission, there may be limited availability of suitable suppliers, especially those compliant with social and ethical standards.
Impact on Procurement:
Limited supplier choice can increase costs and procurement risk. Procurement strategies may need to focus on supplier development, collaboration, or partnerships to meet organisational needs. Parvinder should research supplier markets and potential supply chain risks.
Conclusion:
To effectively advise the new third sector client, Parvinder must research and understand the impact of funding limitations, regulatory compliance, ethical imperatives, stakeholder complexity, and supplier availability on procurement activities. Recognising these factors will enable her to tailor procurement strategies that support the organisation's mission, ensure transparency, and optimise resource use-key to delivering value in the not-for-profit environment.

See the solution in Explanation part below
Explanation:
Essay Plan:
Definition of Stakeholder- someone who has a 'stake' or interest in the company. A person or organisation who influences and can be influenced by the company.
Categories of stakeholders:
1) Internal Stakeholders- these people work inside the company e.g. employees, managers etc
2) Connected- these people work with the company e.g. suppliers, mortgage lenders
3) External Stakeholders - these people are outside of the company e.g. the government, professional bodies, the local community.
Example Essay:
A stakeholder is an individual, group, or entity that has a vested interest or concern in the activities, decisions, or outcomes of an organization or project. Stakeholders are those who can be affected by or can affect the organization, and they play a crucial role in influencing its success, sustainability, and reputation. Understanding and managing stakeholder relationships is a fundamental aspect of effective organizational governance and decision-making and there are several different types of stakeholders.
Firstly, internal stakeholders are those individuals or groups directly connected to the daily operations and management of the organization. Internal stakeholders are key to success and are arguably more vested in the company succeeding. They may depend on the company for their income / livelihood. Anyone who contributes to the company's internal functions can be considered an internal stakeholder for example:
This category includes
1) Employees: With a direct influence on the organization's success, employees are critical internal stakeholders. Their engagement, satisfaction, and productivity impact the overall performance.
2) Management and Executives: The leadership team has a significant influence on the organization's strategic direction and decision-making. Their decisions can shape the company's future.
Secondly, connected stakeholders are those individuals or groups whose interests are tied to the organization but may not be directly involved in its day-to-day operations. Connected stakeholders work alongside the organisation and often have a contractual relationship with the organisation. For example, banks, mortgage lenders, and suppliers. These stakeholders have an interest in the business succeeding, but not as much as internal stakeholders. It is important to keep these stakeholders satisfied as the organisation does depend on them to some extent. For example, it is important that the organisation has a good relationship with their bank / mortgage provider/ supplier as failing to pay what they owe may result in the stakeholders taking legal action against the organisation.
This category includes:
1) Shareholders/Investors: Holding financial stakes in the organization, shareholders seek a return on their investment and have a vested interest in the company's financial performance.
2) Suppliers and Partners: External entities providing goods, services, or collaboration. Their relationship with the organization impacts the quality and efficiency of its operations.
Lastly external stakeholders are entities outside the organization that can influence or be influenced by its actions. This category includes anyone who is affected by the company but who does not contribute to internal operations. They have less power to influence decisions than internal and connected stakeholders. External stakeholders include the government, professional bodies, pressure groups and the local community. They have quite diverse objectives and have varying ability to influence the organisation. For example, the government may be able to influence the organisation by passing legislation that regulates the industry but they do not have the power to get involved in the day-to-day affairs of the company. Pressure groups may have varying degrees of success in influencing the organisation depending on the subject matter. This category includes:
1) Customers: With a direct impact on the organization's revenue, customers are vital external stakeholders. Their satisfaction and loyalty are crucial for the company's success.
2) Government and Regulatory Bodies: External entities overseeing industry regulations. Compliance with these regulations is crucial for the organization's reputation and legal standing.
In conclusion, stakeholders are diverse entities with a vested interest in an organization's activities. The three categories-internal, connected and external -encompass various groups that significantly influence and are influenced by the organization. Recognizing and addressing the needs and concerns of stakeholders are vital for sustainable and responsible business practices.
Tutor Notes
- The above essay is pretty short and to the point and would pass. If you want to beef out the essay you can include some of the following information for a higher score:
- Stakeholders can be harmed by, or benefit from the organisation (can affect and be affected by the organisation). For example a stakeholder can be harmed if the organisation becomes involved in illegal or immoral practices- e.g. the local community can suffer if the organisation begins to pollute the local rivers. The local community can also benefit from the organisation through increased employment levels.
- CSR argues organisations should respect the rights of stakeholder groups
- Stakeholders are important because they may have direct or indirect influence on decisions
- The public sector has a wider and more complex range of stakeholders as they're managed on behalf of society as a whole. They're more likely to take a rage of stakeholder views into account when making decisions. However, these stakeholders are less powerful - i.e. they can't threaten market sanctions, to withdraw funding, or to quit the business etc.
- The essay doesn't specifically ask you to Map Stakeholders, but you could throw in a cheeky mention of Mendelow's Stakeholder Matrix, perhaps in the conclusion. Don't spend time describing it though- you won't get more than 1 point for mentioning it. You'd be better off spending your time giving lots and lots of examples of different types of stakeholders.
- Study guide p. 58

See the solution in Explanation part below
Explanation:
How to approach this question:
- There are 3 terms and an advantage and disadvantage for each you need to talk about. So that's 9 things. Out of 25 points you can see you'll probably only get 1-2 points for each aspect of the question. That shows you the level of detail you need to include - not that much!
- In terms of structure feel free to use headings and bullet points for this one Example Essay Outsourced procurement, shared service units (SSUs), and consortium procurement are distinct approaches to managing procurement activities within organizations. Each method carries its own set of advantages and disadvantages, catering to different organizational needs and circumstances.
Outsourced Procurement: Outsourced procurement involves engaging a procurement consultant or an external organization to provide advice or handle the entire procurement process on behalf of the company. The advantages of outsourced procurement are that it frees up internal resources, allowing them to focus on other tasks. The expertise and skills brought by external consultants can also fill gaps in the organization's capabilities. Moreover, this approach is flexible, adapting well to irregular procurement needs. However, drawbacks include a potential loss of control, higher costs, the need for an additional management layer, and the risk of losing intellectual property (IP).
Shared Service Unit (SSU): A Shared Service Unit is an internal procurement support function within an organization that various divisions can access for assistance, resembling the outsourcing concept but within the organizational structure. The advantages of SSUs lie in potential cost savings, the ability to aggregate demand, and the establishment of common standards and processes across the company. The expertise utilized is internal, providing a sense of familiarity. The disadvantage is that measuring the success of an SSU can be challenging, and there is a risk of stifling innovation. The unit may also be perceived as remote from end users, and procurement processes might be slower due to serving multiple departments.
Consortium Procurement: Consortium procurement involves a collective effort where separate organizations join forces to purchase goods, thereby increasing their bargaining power. The advantages of this approach are in the aggregated demand, resulting in more economical purchases. Pooling knowledge and expertise within the consortium enhances the collective capabilities of its members, providing a sense of safety in numbers. However, disadvantages include a potential loss of individual organizational power, prolonged decision-making processes within the consortium, challenges in responding quickly to demands, and the potential hindrance to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) competing if demand is aggregated.
In conclusion, organizations must carefully consider their specific needs, priorities, and the nature of their procurement requirements when choosing between outsourced procurement, SSUs, or consortium procurement. Each approach offers unique benefits and challenges, and the decision-making process should align with the organization's overall goals and strategies.
Tutor Notes:
- I've named lots of advantages and disadvantages for each of the models. 1-2 advantages and disadvantages of each is all you need to secure you the marks. Remember you only have 35 minutes to write this. A danger with this type of question is spending too long on one aspect of the question and running out of time to answer the rest of it.
- A good idea is to pace yourself and give yourself 10 minutes per term (outsourced, SSU and consortium) then 5 minutes at the end to review and edit your response.
- Some further details you may wish to include:
- Outsourced procurement - this is often used when the organisation doesn't have the expertise to procure the item they need. This often happens for complex / technical procurements or highly regulated industries. An example may be a housing provider who runs a block of flats where the lift has just broken down and cannot be fixed. They need to procure a new lift but have no idea how to write a specification for this as they don't have the technical knowledge of how lifts work. Hiring a consultant who is experienced in tendering for lifts, although expensive, may actually save money by reducing the risk of procuring the wrong thing.
- SSU - a Shared Service Unit acts as a support function for the organisation. This is described in Porter's Value Chain- all other departments can call on the SSU when they require assistance. The SSU is responsible for managing its own costs, employs its own resources and may have contractual agreements with other divisions. The main aim of the SSU is to add value. SSUs are common in large organisations where the core activities don't revolve around procurement (such as finance and service industries).
- Consortium - Consortium buying is encouraged in the public sector in order to maximise value for money. Consortiums can create their own Frameworks. There is a risk that large consortia can abuse their dominant market position.
- LO 3.3 p. 161

See the solution in Explanation part below
Explanation:
- Firstly start with a definition of Corporate Governance - this means the rules, policies, processes and organisational structures that ensure an organisation adheres to accepted ethical standards, good practices, the law and regulations. It's the systems put in place which directs and controls organisations to do 'the right thing'.
- Then move on to discuss why having this is important - I'd maybe think of 3-4 examples here such as: protects the interest of shareholders, reduces risk, moral obligations, legal obligations
- The last part of your essay should talk about the 2 obstacles - describe two from the following list: lack of executive support, poor stakeholder co-operation, lack of clarity and / or resources, having poor IT systems, lack of co-ordination of procurement responsibilities. Because you're only talking about 2 here, you'll need to go into detail about them. So pick 2 you know well. Don't be tempted to talk about more than 2. You won't get extra marks.
Example Essay:
Corporate governance refers to the system of rules, practices, processes, and structures by which a company is directed and controlled. It encompasses the relationships among a company's management, its board of directors, shareholders, and other stakeholders. The primary objective of corporate governance is to ensure that the company operates in an ethical, transparent, and accountable manner, safeguarding the interests of shareholders and promoting long-term value creation. Corporate governance can be defined internally (by shareholders/ managers) or externally (by governments and international standard-setting bodies such as ISO) and is important for all organisations Corporate governance is needed because you can't assume everyone will act ethically- rules and procedures need to be written down and the organisation needs to have recourse for dealing with behaviour that falls outside of what is accepted. Procurement's role in Corporate Governance includes control over finance and expenditure, ensuring the supply chain is 'clean' (i.e. not involved in unethical business practices such as child labour) and risk management.
Why having a corporate governance structure is important:
1) The procurement department has a 'stewardship' role - it controls large sums of organisation's funds. There are many opportunities to commit fraud, make unethical or biased decisions so it's important that there are corporate governance structures in place to prevent this. It protects the organisation from individuals with bad intent, scandal, and legal repercussions.
2) Strong Corporate Governance is required to successfully manage a supply chain. It's important to ensure good relationships- suppliers need to see you as a 'good customer'. If your organisation is seen to be unethical or underhand, suppliers may not want to work with you.
3) Financial impact - where corporate governance isn't implemented, there may be financial costs for the organisation. For example, in the Public Sector if a supplier successfully challenges a tender award, the buyer may have to award the value of the tender - so there's financial impact on a company if corporate governance isn't followed.
Obstacle 1 - lack of senior management support
Unless there is buy-in from the senior leadership team it will not be possible for departments such as Procurement to implement sound Corporate Governance procedures. Corporate Governance needs to be directed from the top of an organisation to ensure all departments and staff give importance to this. If Senior Leadership are seen not to care about implementing or following Corporate Governance, other staff won't care either. They need to lead by example to ensure the whole organisation 'buys into' the processes.
Obstacle 2 - Poor IT infrastructure.
For Corporate Governance to be effective, an effective IT system must be implemented. For example, to avoid fraud it's not just necessary to have a written anti-fraud policy, there must be ways of checking that fraud isn't being committed. The way to do this is to have an effective IT system which can flag anomaly payments and procurement activities outside of what is considered 'normal'. Therefore, having a poor IT infrastructure is a barrier to effective Corporate Governance.
In conclusion, corporate governance is essential for building trust among stakeholders and contributing to the overall success and sustainability of a company. Effective governance structures and practices instil confidence in investors, enhance the company's reputation, and foster a culture of responsibility and accountability throughout the organization. Good corporate governance is a cornerstone of sound business management and contributes to the long-term prosperity of the company.
Tutor Notes
- Corporate Governance became a big thing in the 70s and 80s following high profile scandals and the collapse of several companies. Investors were concerned about what companies were doing which led to increased control on the powers of directors and greater transparency of corporate actions.
- Examples of Corporate Governance. Enron is a good real life example you could use: Impact of Bad Corporate Governance - Corporate Fraud and Corruption: A Holistic Approach to Preventing Financial Crises (ebrary.net)
- This is a really good real-life example of Public Sector procurement gone wrong: Flawed nuclear tender sees £100m payout to firms - BBC News
- Adding in some real life examples will take your essay from a Merit result (50-70%) to a Distinction (70% +)
- Another way this topic can come up as a question is describing the elements of corporate governance, or asking what a procurement manager should do when corporate governance is broken/ not followed.
- LO 3.1 p.117

See the solution in Explanation part below
Explanation:
How to approach this question
- This question is testing to see if you know the 4 procurement procedures allowed in the Public Sector which are: open, restricted, competitive dialogue, competitive dialogue with negotiation. The Public Sector is limited in how it can procure due to the Public Contract Regulations, so things like Early Supplier Involvement isn't an option.
- The question doesn't specifically say it has to be these four, but these are the ones in the book. Because of the vagueness you could say something like running a competition and awarding via a Framework instead. Talking about Public Private Partnerships could also be appropriate but that is outside of the scope of this module (and Level! It comes up in Level 5). These answers would be accepted.
- Also note that it doesn't say the UK in the question, so if you answered this about your own country, that would be fine.
Example Essay
Each country's government has its own regulations relating to how goods, services and works can be procured. The UK's procurement rules is currently dictated by the Public Procurement Regulations 2015 which is based off EU Procurement Directives. This piece of legislation will likely be superseded in Autumn 2023 due to the UK leaving the EU. Until this point, the PCR allows UK public sector organisations to procure in the following ways: open, restricted, competitive dialogue, competitive dialogue with negotiation Open Procedure: This is the most straightforward and transparent method. A local government issues an open tender for office supplies. Any company that provides these supplies can submit a bid. The government then evaluates all bids based on price, quality, and delivery terms to select the supplier. Any interested supplier can submit a tender. The process is open from the outset, and all submissions are evaluated against pre-defined criteri a. This procedure is used when you wish to attract a large number of bidders for the opportunity and is often posted online on a platform such as Find A Tender.com so that suppliers can find the opportunity. If it is a large contract it is a requirement for details to be published on OJEU. The disadvantage of using this approach is that you may receive many bids which can be time-consuming.
Restricted Procedure: In this method, the public sector organization invites suppliers to express their interest. After a preliminary selection process, only those who meet the criteria are invited to submit tenders. This is used when the opportunity is more technical, for example a healthcare authority needs specialized medical equipment. The authority would requests expressions of interest from suppliers. After reviewing these, it invites a shortlist of qualified suppliers to submit detailed bids for further evaluation. The benefit of this approach is that unsuitable suppliers are weeded out early, this saving time.
Competitive Dialogue: This is used for complex contracts where the organization cannot define the technical means or legal or financial make-up of a project in advance. A dialogue with selected bidders is conducted to develop one or more suitable solutions, which are then put out to tender. For example, a local council is planning a new public transport system but is unsure of the best solution. It enters into a dialogue with several firms specializing in transport systems to explore various options before requesting final bids based on the developed solutions. Suppliers can be eliminated through the dialogue process based on pre-determined criteria.
Competitive Dialogue with Negotiation: Similar to competitive dialogue, but with an added phase of negotiation. It's used for particularly complex projects where the needs cannot be met without adaptation of readily available solutions. For example: a government department requires a complex IT system that integrates various existing systems. It engages in a competitive dialogue to develop potential solutions and then negotiates with bidders to refine these solutions before finalizing the contract. This procedure allows for negotiations with the winning bidder to readjust requirements if needed.
The approach taken by a public sector organisation will depend on a number of factors, but in particular the complexity of the project and whether there is a pre-determined scope. Other factors to consider include; the time-sensitiveness of the project and how quickly the procurement exercise needs to be completed, the amount of suppliers in the marketplace, and whether suppliers need to be consulted on to create the specification.
Tutor Notes
- These four procedures are outlined on p.212. Post PCR 2015, these procedures may change, or be renamed, depending on what the UK government decide to do. So if you're taking this exam in November 2024 or later, note that the study guide is now out of date and you should conduct a bit of your own research.
- You could also mention that the value of spend is a factor when public sector organisations are deciding on a procurement route. For really low value stuff, like they need a new sofa for the office, most organisation's requirements are to get three quotes and compare them. That isn't in the study guide, it's just real life (I've worked in this sector so know this stuff). Each organisation will have it's own thresholds for what procurement route needs to be taken, so I wouldn't comment on that but generally if it's under £10k there's quite a bit of flexibility. Where you reach 'threshold' then things become very serious and there's much more scrutiny.
- Thresholds are not part of the syllabus so don't worry about learning this. But if you're interested have a read here: New public procurement thresholds from 1 January 2024 - BM Insights - Blake Morgan

See the solution in Explanation part below
Explanation:
How to approach this question.
- There's many aspects to this question - make sure you're answering them all:
- Explain what added value is and explain what 'ensuring processes are compliant' means (this could be your introduction) Added Value = achieving more for the same money. May be in producing an item cheaper, or by procuring additional features at no additional cost. Requires innovation and creativity. The focus is on the outcome. Compliant Processes - this is focusing on the process, rather than the outcome. Ensuring that purchases are made in line with internal and external rules/ procedures. This may be following Standard Operating Procedures, purchasing to strict budgets and the exclusive use of e-procurement tools.
- Explain the consequences of focusing on added value over compliance; can result in maverick spending, less visibility for management, may have additional risks if procuring items without following procedures - this may have legal and financial repercussions, Time-consuming, May lead to added expenses
- Consequences of focusing on compliance over added value; May foster a silo-mentality, Misses out on flexibility and agility, misses out on collaborative whole life costs reductions, Procurement function becomes rigid, inflexible and inwardly focused
- How both can be achieved; 1) Seek to add value only for certain purchases such as capital-expenditure items and not for others such as stationary.2) Ensure time is well-spent i.e. focus on added value for purchases where this can be most achieved, and focus on compliance where there is high risks. 3) Review processes regularly to ensure both goals are being achieved 4) Complete 'lessons learned' activities after big procurement activities to advise on future procurement activities- were both Added Value and Compliance achieved? How could this be improved next time?
- these three should form the main body of your essay. Above are many ideas you could explore, you won't have time to talk about all of them so pick a couple that resonate with you Conclusion - the balance is important Example Essay Added value refers to the extra worth or enhancement a company provides to a product, service, or process that goes beyond the intrinsic value inherent in the initial input. It represents the additional benefits or features that make a product or service more desirable to customers, often justifying a higher price or distinguishing it from competitors. Procurement often look to achieve added value in procurement activities but achieving this whilst remaining compliant (adhering to established laws, regulations, standards, and internal policies) can be tricky. Achieving a delicate equilibrium between pursuing added value and ensuring stringent compliance in procurement activities is pivotal. This essay explores the consequences of emphasizing one area over the other and outlines strategies for organizations to successfully navigate the dual goals of attaining added value and maintaining compliance.
Consequences of Focusing Solely on Added Value:
Prioritizing added value without due consideration for compliance can expose an organization to a myriad of risks. One notable consequence is the potential compromise of regulatory requirements and legal standards. For instance, if a procurement team is solely driven by obtaining cost-effective solutions or innovative products, they may inadvertently overlook compliance with industry-specific regulations, leading to legal ramifications and reputational damage.
Moreover, an exclusive focus on added value may neglect crucial ethical considerations. An organization, in pursuit of cost savings or improved efficiency, might engage with suppliers that violate ethical standards or engage in unethical business practices such as modern day slavery. Such associations can tarnish the organization's reputation, eroding the trust of stakeholders and customers alike.
Consequences of Overemphasizing Compliance:
Conversely, a hyper-focus on compliance without adequate consideration for added value can result in missed opportunities and suboptimal outcomes. Strict adherence to procedural norms and regulations might lead to an overly bureaucratic procurement process, hindering innovation and stifling the organization's ability to adapt swiftly to market changes.
Furthermore, an excessive emphasis on compliance might limit engagement with suppliers, stifling creativity and potential breakthroughs. For instance, a procurement team rigidly adhering to compliance protocols might miss out on collaborating with smaller, innovative suppliers that could offer unique and value-added solutions.
Strategies for Achieving Both Added Value and Compliance:
To navigate the delicate balance between added value and compliance, organizations can adopt several strategic approaches. First and foremost, an organization should establish clear procurement policies and procedures that incorporate both compliance requirements and avenues for seeking added value. This ensures that all procurement activities align with regulatory standards while leaving room for innovation.
Effective supplier management plays a pivotal role in achieving this balance. By thoroughly vetting and categorizing suppliers based on their ability to deliver value and comply with regulations, organizations can strategically align their procurement activities. For example, suppliers that have a proven track record of compliance can be trusted with critical components, while those offering innovative solutions may be engaged for projects that prioritize added value.
Leveraging technology is another essential strategy. Implementing advanced procurement software that integrates compliance checks and offers analytics for value assessment can significantly enhance the efficiency of procurement processes. Automated systems can streamline due diligence, ensuring that suppliers meet compliance standards while providing insights into their potential to deliver added value.
Additionally, fostering a culture of collaboration within the procurement team and across organizational departments is crucial. Encouraging open communication enables different stakeholders to contribute insights on compliance and added value. Cross-functional collaboration ensures that procurement decisions align with broader organizational goals and values.
In conclusion, the strategic balancing act between achieving added value and ensuring compliance in procurement is indispensable for organizational success. By recognizing the consequences of favouring one area over the other and adopting a holistic approach, this safeguards against risks but also positions the organization for sustained growth and competitiveness in the ever-evolving business landscape.
Tutor Notes:
- Examples highlight that you understand the material you have studied and can apply it to real life scenarios. You could take a certain industry or organisation and explain the consequences for them of focusing on one over the other. E.g. In the construction industry it is very important that organisations achieve compliance in their procurement activities. This includes ensuring there are robust contracts in place and that legislation such as CDM and Health and Safety is followed. When procuring a construction contract the danger of focusing on Added Value over compliance is that this may result in key legislation being forgotten which leads to legal proceedings against the buyer. For example, if the buyer procures a construction contract without fulfilling the responsibilities outlined in the CDM and H&S regulations, this can result in huge fines for the company and potential jail time for senior management.
- The risk of focusing on compliance over added value may be in missing out on alternative proposals. For example, if a buyer is procuring a construction project of a new hospital and they focus too much on compliance, they may not engage in Early Supplier Involvement or cross-functional working which may bring up alternative ideas such as different ways the hospital could be built. The alternative ideas may result in higher quality or cost savings which are missed by the buyer. This results in a more costly, or lower-quality hospital being built.
- Overall, what CIPS are testing you on here is that you understand that the procurement department should aim to achieve both - it's a balancing act between compliance and added value and this could be viewed as a pendulum- it's important not to swing too heavily in one direction. That's actually a really good metaphor - feel free to use that in your conclusion!
- study guide p. 114