What are the eight elements of whole life asset management?

See the answer in explanation.
Explanation:
Whole life asset management is the process of evaluating the total price and all associated costs of a product to make an informed decision as to which option will provide the organization with the best value for money option: To achieve this the organization works at the following eight elements.
1. Identify need/objectives/risk: The first stage of the whole life asset management is the same as the first stage in the CIPS procurement and supply cycle: identify the need prior to any asset being procured; the need could be competition in the marketplace, raised/reduced demands or financial concern. Once this need has been identified, the objectives of the new assets need to be set, and this may include being more energy efficient, reducing cost or saving money.
Risk also needs to be explored. When investing in a new asset there are factors to be considered that may or may not be advantageous to the investment. These include; downtime, lost sale/revenue or associated cost.
2. Procurement: Procurement professional would have to source and arrange supply of the asset.
3. Construction: ones the supply has being arranged, then the designing and the manufacturing of the asset begins.
4. Commissioning
5. Deterioration/maintenance
6. Condition performance monitoring
7. Decommissioning
8. Renewal/replacement

What potential costs could an organization face if it fails to conduct Due diligence effectively?

See the answer in explanation.
Explanation:
Though strong due diligence procurement professionals can assess which suppliers or potential suppliers appear to meet the criteria associated with ethical practice.
Prior to the contract being awarded, strong due diligence can save the organization from the following cost:
1) Cost of reputation
2) Environmental damage
3) Stakeholders dissatisfaction,
4) poor quality and rework
5) Breach of contract
6) Ethical concerns

(a) Describe a supplier evaluation approach that HFS could use to select a bidder using the table provided, including a proposal for an appropriate weighting method for scoring the bidders.
(10 marks)
(b) Recommend and justify which ONE of the bidders should be awarded the contract and why each of the three other bids should be rejected.
(15 marks)
Heart Financial Services
Heart Financial Services (HFS) is a medium-sized private sector financial services company, with a iarge office headquarters m the suburbs of a major city. HFS has just received the bids shown below in response to an invitation to tender for a five-year contract to provide cleaning services for this office building.
in the past five years, HFS paid €160,000 for these cleaning services: but HFS was not satisfied with the quality of Cleaning service that was provided. The existing cleaning contractor. DuffOean. was getting to the end of the contract and had not bid this time.
Bid price (5 year contract) International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9000 certification Investors in People (IIP) certification International Labour Organization: (ILO) certification International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14000 certification Associated Cleaning (A): €120.000 No Yes NO No Brlght'N'Clean (B): €135.000 No Yes Yes No CleenKwik (C): €132.000 Yes Yes Yes Yes Doubleshine (D): €M2.000 No No No No

See the answer in explanation.below.
Explanation:
2(a) Describe a supplier evaluation approach that HFS could use to select a bidder using the table provided, including a proposal for an appropriate weighting method for scoring the bidders. (10 marks) HFS should use a weighted scoring supplier evaluation approach . This method is suitable because there are several award criteria, not just price, and HFS has already experienced poor cleaning quality under the previous contract. Therefore, HFS should assess both cost and quality-related factors before selecting the successful bidder.
A sensible approach would be:
Step 1: Set evaluation criteria
Using the tender table, HFS can evaluate bidders against:
* bid price
* ISO 9000 certification
* Investors in People (IIP) certification
* labour standards criterion linked to ILO requirements
* ISO 14000 certification.
ISO says the ISO 9000 family supports quality management and consistent delivery, while ISO 14001 is the recognised framework for environmental management. Investors in People is an externally recognised accreditation for people management.
Step 2: Apply weightings
Because HFS was not satisfied with the quality of the previous cleaning service, quality and service assurance should carry more weight than price alone. A suitable weighting could be:
* Price = 40%
* ISO 9000 = 25%
* IIP = 15%
* ILO criterion = 10%
* ISO 14000 = 10%
This totals 100%. The reason for this weighting is that price is important, but service quality should be prioritised for a five-year contract. ISO 9001 is especially relevant because it is the best-known quality management standard and is intended to support consistent products and services. ISO 14001 is also relevant because it gives assurance on environmental management.
Step 3: Score the bidders
For price , HFS could award the full 40 marks to the lowest bid and score the others proportionately using the formula:
Lowest bid ÷ bidder's price × price weighting
Using €120,000 as the lowest bid:
* A = 120,000 / 120,000 × 40 = 40.00
* B = 120,000 / 135,000 × 40 = 35.56
* C = 120,000 / 132,000 × 40 = 36.36
* D = 120,000 / 142,000 × 40 = 33.80
For the certification criteria, a simple method would be:
* Yes = full marks
* No = zero
So the total weighted scores would be:
* A = 40 + 0 + 15 + 0 + 0 = 55.00
* B = 35.56 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 60.56
* C = 36.36 + 25 + 15 + 10 + 10 = 96.36
* D = 33.80 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 33.80
Overall, this weighted evaluation method is appropriate because it gives HFS a transparent and objective way to compare bids while reflecting the importance of service quality, people management and environmental standards, not just lowest price.
2(b) Recommend and justify which ONE of the bidders should be awarded the contract and why each of the three other bids should be rejected. (15 marks) Based on the weighted scoring analysis, CleenKwik (C) should be awarded the contract.
Recommended bidder: CleenKwik (C)
CleenKwik should be selected because it offers the best overall value rather than just the lowest price. Its bid of €132,000 is only slightly above the lowest bid, but it is the only bidder with all four listed accreditations or compliance indicators in the table: ISO 9000, IIP, ILO criterion and ISO 14000 . This is important because HFS has already had poor service quality from the previous contractor, so quality assurance should be a major factor in the decision. ISO 9001 is specifically designed to support consistent service quality, while ISO
14001 supports structured environmental management. Investors in People also gives assurance on workforce management, which is relevant in a labour-intensive cleaning contract.
CleenKwik therefore represents the strongest balance between price, quality, staff management and environmental responsibility . For a five-year service contract, that makes it the most suitable choice.
Why Associated Cleaning (A) should be rejected
Associated Cleaning has the lowest price at €120,000 , but it only has IIP certification and lacks the other three criteria. This means it gives weaker assurance on quality systems, labour standards and environmental management. Since HFS's main problem in the last contract was poor cleaning quality, selecting the cheapest bidder without strong quality evidence would be risky. Therefore, A should be rejected because the low price does not compensate for the lack of broader service assurance.
Why Bright'N'Clean (B) should be rejected
Bright'N'Clean is a stronger bid than A because it has IIP and the ILO-related criterion , but it still lacks ISO 9000 and ISO 14000 . This is significant because ISO 9001 is the strongest direct indicator in the table for quality management, and HFS is specifically trying to avoid another poor-quality contract. B is also more expensive than both A and C. Therefore, B should be rejected because it offers less assurance than C while not being the cheapest option.
Why Doubleshine (D) should be rejected
Doubleshine should be rejected because it is the highest-priced bid at €142,000 and has none of the listed certifications or indicators. This means HFS would be paying the highest price for the weakest quality and compliance evidence. There is no justification for awarding the contract to D when it scores lowest on overall value.
Conclusion
In conclusion, CleenKwik (C) should be awarded the contract because it achieves the highest weighted score and provides the strongest evidence of quality, people management, labour-related assurance and environmental management. The other three bids should be rejected because they either provide insufficient quality assurance, poorer overall value, or both. This recommendation is justified because HFS needs to improve service quality, not simply reduce cost.

What is depreciation and deterioration?

See the answer in explanation.
Explanation:
When an organization want to purchase an asset, it considers the depreciation and deterioration in the whole life of the asset and how it will be manage.
Depreciation is the reduction in value of a tangible and a fixed asset over time. The purpose of calculating the depreciation of the asset is to give the organization a fair and current view of what the asset is worth at a particular time. Depreciation is a way of converting the cost of an asset into an expense over a period of time.
Depreciation is a permanent feature listed against an asset throughout its life time and it based on wear and tear, reduction in performance and reduction in value.
Deterioration is the process of something becoming lower in quality or performance. The longer the asset can last without deteriorating the better value the asset represents.
* Refer to the question column for response

Create a list of primary and secondary Data sources?

See the answer in explanation.
Explanation:
Data can be primary or secondary
Primary data are derived from original work or research through experience. Primary data can be gathered from the following sources; 1) Interview (2) survey (3) meetings (4) case studies.
Secondary data is derived from a previous source, i.e. somebody else has gathered the data. Secondary data can be gained from; (1) Books (2) Websites, Trade magazines, etc